Skip to main content

A joke grandpa told

Two men walk towards a cafe in the Mariahilfer Strasse. One them is very tall and broad shouldered and walks with a confident demeanour. The other is short and thin and seems a little unsure of himself.

As they walk the large man says to the smaller man:

"Why is it," he says, "why is it that when I walk my steps ring out echoing from the houses, but when you walk all I can hear is just the soft pitter patter of tiny feet?"

The little man, Heini, doesn't answer, but looks mournful. They walk into the cafe and sit down and the large man calls the waiter:

Hey waiter, "Ein Grosser Brauner" for me and a "Ein Kleiner Schwarzer" for my companion, said the man.

"But...but..." said the little man.

Covering up the little man's objections, in a loud voice, Rudi orders two large slices of strudel. In the following silence, while they wait for the waiter, Rudi asks Heini rhetorically:

"Tell me, why is it that when I talk even the chandeliers rattle, but when you talk everyone has to lean forwards to hear you?"

The coffee and strudel arrive. Rudi quickly eats his strudel in two bites and gulps down his coffee. Hieni, disheartened just takes a bite and a sip.

"And why is it," said Rudi, "that when I eat; snap, snap, snap, it's gone. Like a Lion eating its prey. But when you eat it's nibble, nibble nibble just like a tiny little mouse."

After the cake and the coffee they both have to go to the toilet and piss. After a while the large man reflects:

"Isn't it curious; when I piss it sounds like the great roaring of a waterfall, but when you piss I can't even hear a tinkle."

The little man looks up at Rudi.

"That's because I'm pissing on your leg."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-