Skip to main content

Eve Hall on how to trash a community and how to make it flourish

    Mom with John and Carmen

Employers' guide to trashing a community


It doesn't take much to start trashing a community. For a start, bring in people from hundreds of kilometres away to replace permanent workers. Don't offer the incoming workers anything but piecemeal and temporary jobs for the barest minimum wage (if they are lucky). What happens to them when they aren't employed is none of your business.
Advertise these wonderful opportunities on the local radio station to make sure you have got a surplus to choose from. Don't give them housing, let them squat, wherever, but let the proper houses that were occupied by the permanent workers, before they were retrenched, fall into the hands of thieves and squatters who take away the doors and the windows and finally, show incredulity when crime happens.

Subcontracting and sub-contracting ...
big fleas and little fleas...

This process is in danger of gaining momentum. Like it says in the jingle, big fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em - and the little fleas and so on ad infinitum.

Most subcontractors don't have a permanent workforce but hire and fire according to the work that's passed on to them. Minimum Wages and Unemployment Insurance aren't words that are bandied about much.

In short these are phenomenon that the World Bank are proud of promoting: Sub contraction is one of the ills that globalisation brings in its wake: Insecurity. What do temporary workers do on days when they are not working and they haven't got money in their pockets?

They have little to do, they just hang about and petty theft becomes more common. The crime rate goes up.

Yes it's true that not all the blame should fall on the subcontracting companies . Some, after all, are just providing work to people who would otherwise have no jobs at all.

The government thinks it is cleaver encouraging deregulation and subcontracting as a way of generating employment. But deregulation means ditching labour laws that used to give workers some security. If conditions of work lead to insecurity and crime, what does this say about the quality of that work?

The International Labour Organisation has launched the quaint notion into our world that work has to be decent if it is to address the problems of poverty and crime. It describes decent work as work that is productive and secure, provides an adequate income and offers social protection.
Until government and employers begin to take this seriously, the effects of globalisation will increasingly trickle down into our communities and they are just as destructive as a virus.

How to make a community flourish

Taken from a talk given by the American environmentalist, Wendell berry.

  • Ask what any change will do to your community.
  • Include local nature as part of your community.
  • Ask how local needs might be supported from local sources, including the mutual help of neighbours.
  • Understand the ultimate unsoundness of the doctrine of labour saving if that implies poor work, unemployment or any kind of pollution or contamination.
  • Develop small scale industries and businesses.
  • Strive to produce as much of your own energy as possible.
  • Strive to increase earnings, in whatever form within the community.
  • Invest in the communities to maintain its properties, keep it clean (without dirtying some other place) look after its old people and teach its children.
  • Arrange for the young and the old to take care of each other, eliminating institutionalised child care and "homes" for the aged.
  • The young must learn from the old.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-