Skip to main content

There is no forgiveness for the Nazis, there never will be

Child's drawing in Terezin: From the Jewish Museum in Prague

The Butterfly

"The Butterfly"
The last, the very last,
So richly, brightly, dazzlingly yellow.
Perhaps if the sun's tears would sing
against a white stone. . . .
Such, such a yellow
Is carried lightly 'way up high.
It went away I'm sure because it wished to
kiss the world good-bye.
For seven weeks I've lived in here,
Penned up inside this ghetto.
But I have found what I love here.
The dandelions call to me
And the white chestnut branches in the court.
Only I never saw another butterfly.
That butterfly was the last one.
Butterflies don't live in here,
in the ghetto.
- by Pavel Friedman
 

The Christians are wrong. And considering the fact that the present Pope was a member of the Hitler youth and that the Catholic church played an ignominious role during the war, that institution is deeply tainted with the crime of the holocaust and continues to be so.


There can be no forgiveness, there can only be hatred for the people who committed the atrocities against the Jewish people in World War II. We should feel and act on a deep, undying, undiminishing and fatal hatred - perpetual enemity - towards all those who are in any way sympathetic to the German fascists and their apologists.
The Nazi's count on the non-existence of God and fear no retribution in the afterlife, but they have their modern day beneficiaries and heirs and friends.

The anger we feel against the Nazis, is as powerful as it ever was, shouted from the windows, should be turned on them. The relatives of 6 million jews are many. The relatives of all the people who were killed by the fascists number millions and millions. Any of us who read our history and discover our personal histories must learn to hate.

This anger and energy should focus itself on the modern day fascists and racists and the kind of people in big business who support criminal dictatorships and kill directly or indirectly for profit.
The heirs of the Nazis are many. The heirs of the Nazis and their heirs are many. The fight against fascism continues.

The BNP and the European Neo Nazis. should be the focus of our hatred, they should be the first targets of our retribution. In very possible legitimate and allowable way.

Comments

  1. That is such a dangerous thought, Phil. Certainly there should be no forgiveness, but hatred is fuel to the fire. They do not care if you hate them, in fact they enjoy and consume your hatred, amplify, regiment and use it. They do not like to be pitied however. Pity them their ignorance and stupidity and work cold and calculating to dismantle their organisation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In a sense I agree. But isn't there something more radical and dynamic in hatred? It is a dangerous thought. But it is the thought that motivated the maquis to fight against the Nazis isn't it?

    How can you ask victims of genocide to forgive the people who conducted the genocide? Is it the duty of these people to forgive? Is it the duty of the children or the children's children etc to forgive.

    The word anger is interchangeable with the word hatred.

    Now I teach someone at the moment who is quite friendly to me. He used to be a Baathist intellgence officer in Iraq. He seems like a nice person. He's a bit self pitying though.

    So I asked him. You must have done a lot of things that trouble you. His answer is to Pause and say "No, no."

    Now I am sure that there are people who would cheerfully do him a lot of harm. Who would not forget. Iraqis.

    I don't hat him, not because I am a great person, but simply because my imagination fails me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So if I were able to cast myself back in time and if I could relive the suffering of Terezin then I would not forgive and I would not forget. And I would hate.

    To hate you need imagination.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-