Skip to main content

South Africa, John Saul and the Global Miasma

John Saul and the Global Miasma

(Written in January 2001)


John Saul's important essay in Monthly Review, Cry for the Beloved Country, so thoughtful and balanced, reawakened me to The Critique on South Africa. It laid down what I consider to be the correct historical markers for the last decade, and pointed to possible entry points for progressive change within what has to remain, for me, The Movement, if only as a broad framework – and which The Movement ignored, or rejected, one after another.

I'll offer one reminder of the way our leadership was driven back behind the line when they uttered even the slightest bleat that was not in the corporate script for change: it was mid-to-late 1991, I think, when Mandela was reported as saying that the ANC would seek to introduce anti-trust laws and institutions of the kind the US had. For this mildest of comments, he was immediately shot down in flames by Anglo American – Gavin Reilly, I think it was – for such reckless talk...(and he must have used an air-to-ground missile, because Anglo was busy parachuting its billions of capital out of the country around that time.)

Those other early remarks – nice, but naïve – from ANC leadership about ‘using the state as a means to empower our people, just as the Afrikaners did in their time’ were similarly huffed and puffed at, and ridiculed by the megacorps and their media.

But as John Saul so precisely clarifies at each point, these are NOT excuses for their dragging our society and economy along behind them on their present fools' errand into the global miasma.


Tony Hall

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-