Skip to main content

Don't trust this man

David Cameron the Tory estate agent

Trust me I am a posh estate agent, yah.


The badly hidden agenda of the Tories is to sell off state sector institutions to the highest bidders, to slash the public sector's share of Britain's GDP and privatise everything that moves.

Today the headlines read that the Tories will put tax reduction at the centre of their policy making and start cutting public spending immediately. Of course this is quite natural for a party that represents the well-off.

The well-off have private health insurance, the well off send their children to public schools, the well-off don't need state pensions and unemployment benefits, instead they have share portfolios which often include lucrative investments in the banking and financial sector, in the armaments industry and in US controlled companies like BP. The rich feed off the profits accruing from financial speculation. How many sharks out there benefited from the privatisation of BT, the Railroads, the water companies, the utilities. Cameron's friends have come back for more. They want it all. They want the health sector and education too.

The state sector is there for to benefit of the majority of the population not the upper middle and middle classes. The Bullingdon Toffs are annoyed that the higher proportion of tax that they pay, "wrongfully" gets used for things that don't directly benefit them except to placate the hoi poloi. The Bullingdons see taxation as a form of parasitical wealth redistribution back through the public sector to the less well-off. They much prefer Victorian notions of charity to the benighted. Bring in the NGOs to do the work of government.

The Conservatives say they will:

  • immediately start making serious cutbacks in public finance.
  • reduce taxation for the rich (the inheritance tax).
  • cancel the projected increase in National Insurance.
  • help business and small business with tax cuts
  • reduce the amount of regulation and quality control.

And at the same time the "caring and compassionate" Conservatives claim they will also be able to:

  • protect the NHS.
  • avoid a double recession.
  • get the economy restarted on a "sound footing".

These claims seem contradictory, impossible to achieve and they are difficult to take seriously, but we should take them very seriously indeed.

There is a way that the Conservatives will be able to do what they want to do. They will be able to do reduce public debt and restart the economy if they alter the whole balance and nature of the British economy and turn us into a kind of US hybrid economy.

The Conservatives will be able to achieve their objectives if they destroy the social democratic state apparatus in Britain and sell it off to private interests. The public sector forms 25% of our economy. Now that's a large piece of pie for Dave and his spivvy private sector mates to get their mitts onto. Dave Cameron, estate agent extraordinaire in waiting.

Cameron will borrow Blair's worn out sheep's clothing, but he is a wolf, just like Blair was.

He will guarantee that there will be service provision and that it will be affordable and say that it doesn't matter who provides it. Business will take over every sector of public life with the exception, perhaps, of the army and police. The Tories will take all this subcontracting and privatisation to the radical limit.

And for a while, while the private sector feeds off the public sector like the carrion eaters they are, (apologies to all real hyenas and vultures for the comparison) and for a while the economy will be seen to be active with money changing hands and profits flowing into the City.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-