Skip to main content

Song-To the Men of England: a response

Cremation of Shelly

Song-To the Men of England


by Percy Bysshe Shelley

Men of England, wherefore plough
For the lords who lay ye low?
Wherefore weave with toil and care
The rich robes your tyrants wear?

Wherefore feed and clothe and save,
From the cradle to the grave,
Those ungrateful drones who would
Drain your sweat -nay, drink your blood?

Wherefore, Bees of England, forge
Many a weapon, chain, and scourge,
That these stingless drones may spoil
The forced produce of your toil?

Have ye leisure, comfort, calm,
Shelter, food, love's gentle balm?
Or what is it ye buy so dear
With your pain and with your fear?

The seed ye sow another reaps;
The wealth ye find another keeps;
The robes ye weave another wears;
The arms ye forge another bears.

Sow seed, -but let no tyrant reap;
Find wealth, -let no imposter heap;
Weave robes, -let not the idle wear;
Forge arms, in your defence to bear.

Shrink to your cellars, holes, and cells;
In halls ye deck another dwells.
Why shake the chains ye wrought? Ye see
The steel ye tempered glance on ye.

With plough and spade and hoe and loom,
Trace your grave, and build your tomb,
And weave your winding-sheet, till fair
England be your sepulchre!

Response to: Song-To the Men of England

Dear Percy,

Sentiments much appreciated,
But only the aesthetic quality of your verse -
How inspiring it is - the tone, the rythm, the melody, has merit

What you actually say, on the other hand, is not convincing as real art.

What a master of poetic technique you are
But as for your words,
I don't think you quite understand
The rich are the wealth
Creators.

And so, really, you should reconsider
Your flowing, albeit very beautiful, flight of rhetoric
And instead ponder on the merits of
The heroic entrepreneur:
The primo progeniteur.

Think how hard it is to reproduce the conditions of production - and usufruction.

Dedicate yourself to this noble task instead of poetic subduction.

Then, perhaps, if you're warm and fluffy
We'll make you a poet Laureate
Like Carol Anne Duffy

Back to business,
My little creative entrepreneur,
My little choufleur.
Without this money magic
We wouldn't know what to do.
Wheels wouldn't turn
The sky would fall
In fact we'd all be dead...

Pups wouldn't get sold.

The entrepreneur is a veritable mage
His work is worth triple times ten
The work that you do.

Don't try to question this just look
at the proof.

Ye have leisure, comfort, calm,
Shelter, food, love's gentle balm
This is all thanks to him and us, dear, not you
and your revolutionary crew.

So run along now and keep working on your diction
Because the rest of what you say Shelley
We are going to file under fiction.

Comments

  1. That is very cool. Loved your comment in The Guardian re poetry as a class adornment. That was very cool too. I think it is becoming more and more apparent. Rage on,

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the encouragement Paul.

    I read something yesterday about this. Something discussing how the aesthetic was highlighted and fetishised to detract from the political power of poetry. And by political power we are not just talking shallow identity politics.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That is a great idea, one I have vaguely thought but never heard formulated so well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lots of room to be really constructively subversive then, hey Paul?

    BTW Do you play an instrument? That's the feeling I get from your poems.

    But I can't quite guess what instrument. The double bass? Perhaps the piano.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-