Skip to main content

Multiblogger platforms are taking off at the moment in magazine formats.

Now is the time for all good bloggers to come to the aid of free and open writing.

Allow me to make you a decorous proposition, my fellow bloggers, with a view to a marriage of minds. And if not a marriage, then let us at least gather on the same pages,despite our differences.

It’s quite lonely to blog on your own and you end up with you and your circle of like minded chaps and chapesses. Multiblogger plaforms are taking off at the moment in magazine formats.

The idea is to kind of focus on one area, but in fact you are free to write what you like. It’s no big deal so long as you contribute with one article of your own a week – around 500 words, with or without a pictures.

Basically, I – I would prefer Baron to do this – set up a page. Eveyone gets a log in. There is an editor involved so it is preferable that everything gets sent to him to be subbed and topped and tailed.

But if you are very precious, (in a good way of course), about word conservation, then you can just upload it.

Your articles can be prefaced by the title of your own blog and linked to it. Or you could just use your by-line.

You can also commission (no money involved) other people to write articles for you and give them a byline.

The point would be to generate interesting content.

I think we could make quite a splash and we could even ask the Guardian to do a story on it or link to it or something.

And it wouldn’t be so lonely or cliquey

Of course if someone else wants to set it up then I will follow as a contributor.

In this arrangement no one would be privileged.

We have some marvellous people who have agreed to contribute regularly and who like the idea.

How about you?

Phil/ISA

By the way, is there a libel lawyers out there willing to help out?

Comments

  1. Anonymous14:23

    I like this idea

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous14:41

    First post worked... I'll expand.

    I like this idea.

    I tried to set up my own feeble blog a while back and it seemed a lot of hassle for a very busy room. And who's listening? So much easier to post on GU website but also appreciate good voices/posts lost to the mods (have only been modded twice... both for saying accurate, if rude, things about Sunderland football club I believe)and they remain, increasingly so, "the man".

    Similarly if you write on other folks' blogs you are expected to,consciously or otherwise, conform to their general house rules/style. These cn be even prissier/moddier than the GU (take your shoes off please, I'm queen bee here) or have dominant values not entirely in keeping with your own (e.g. the laddish/blokeish soh that finds sheep porn etc. hilarious). A magazine type format would allow for a sort of semi-detached middle way where you could have different voices/values expressed within in a generally united front.

    I'm sure I could bash out 500 words of the art, wit n wisdom of pinkroom most weeks.

    Happy to contribute if you get this started.

    Count me in

    ReplyDelete
  3. OK Pinkroom. Careful with sensibilities. Let's be PC in the best sense of the word. We must be inclusive.

    What's your patch?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous16:29

    pinkroom9@wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. No, I mean what area de you want to write on? Something specific.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous20:04

    Like most of us about these parts my interest is in big venn diagram thingies like literature/poetry, politics/ideology and language/culture... it's the tensions/cross-overs/contradictions in and between those areas that fascinate me. If there are no takers I quite fancy sport/sport as metaphor. I loved your own Zizou piece for example and would be very happy to run with something like that (with poetry) for a while... in an inclusive, (broadly) pc way of course.

    ReplyDelete
  7. That is a great idea. I have seen it work many times. The whole is more than the sum of its planets.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Please join in Paul

    ReplyDelete
  9. Pollyanna15:01

    Hey Phil,
    Yes I'd like to be involved. I had a few questions... So you say you want it to be like a magazine format, are you imagining every section being updated on the same day as if it were a new issue? It might be better if it had a regular day for people to know when to call by. Also did you have specific areas you wanted to see covering, or a general theme for the whole?

    I was sort of joking about the shoes, but I thought maybe I could sort of cover women's issues & social issues, well mostly just my own issues and I happen to be a woman, I don't propose to be representative. Plus I'm not meaning anything reactionary, just my musings really. But if it's needed I'm happy to muse under specified topics only.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Well what we might do to begin is a sort of rotating blog format and then go onto a magazine format if there is enough interest.

    Perhaps the arts would be a good place to start.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Pollyanna16:44

    I could limit it to the arts I'd imagine. I already have some stored up rantings about Chick lit.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Cool. Give me some time to get it ready. I'll keep everyone posted.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov