Skip to main content

Nipper, with love and hope



















The Barraud children and the Powell children play together and at the the centre of their happy band is Nipper.

Nipper understands his family's movements. For example, when there is a general bustle and everyone starts to put their hats and coats on, he leaps onto the third step in the hallway. There, he catches their eye and smiles a doggy smile at the children until, finally, one of them calls out:

"Put Nipper's lead on, will you."

And someone else obliges. Clip! And they are ready to set off into the streets of Clifton. On Sundays the families go to church, which is not a place for dogs and, by way of explanation, someone calls out to Nipper:

"Church, Nipper."

And he sinks down onto the wooden step with a moan, watching everyone leave without him. Nipper, with his head between his paws.

"Are you all telling the truth?", he thinks.

Despite his dislike of religion, Nipper is a morally responsible dog. Above all he can't stand cigars. He doesn't like their smell and understands that they are a fire hazard. When Mark Barraud lets fall a match, Nipper dabs at it disapprovingly with one paw until a little trail of smoke signifies it is out.

And when, Francis lets his cigar butt drop, Nipper can't grind it out. It's too painful, so he stands over it and:

"Bark! Bark! Bark, bark, bark!"

- until someone takes notice and gets rid of the burning, stinking thing.

Nipper is brave, he has lost an eye in a fight with a rat. He can do party tricks too. The children line up a long row of biscuits and cakes and everyone is told which treat is theirs - including Nipper.

Later, at a word, Nipper is released and leaps towards his treat, flicking it up into the air and catching it with a flourish, to great applause.

But the terrier is not perfect: Sometimes he nips unsuspecting postmen, tradesmen and debt collectors in the calves. But more than anything, Nipper loves Mark Barraud. He might be playing ball with the children or hide and seek or being given a biscuit, but whatever he is doing and wherever he is, if he hears his master's whistle:

"Weeeeeeeeee!"

He drops everything and rushes off to Mark's side.

* * *


One day the whistling stops. Mark has gone. Unknown to Nipper, he has died of cancer of the lungs. The debt collectors call frequently, but Nipper doesn't have the heart to bite them in the calves anymore.

Now Francis, Mark's brother, can't pay the bills and he has to find new homes for his brother's children. He doesn't have enough money to support them. Their first happy childhood together is at an end. The Powell children lose their friends the Barrauds to orphanages and foster homes.

Later, when the house is, empty and silent, Mark's brother Francis comes in and sits down on Mark's chair with Nipper beside him.

With the hope of bringing Mark's memory back for a moment, Francis gets up to put a recording cylinder Mark and he had made together, into a borrowed gramaphone.

Nipper perks up and barks in amazement.

"Mark is back! Where?"

Nipper comes over to the to the trumpet and looks into it with love and hope. Shall everything shall be as it was? Will there be Mark, cakes and biscuits, the children, the family and fun.

No, there shan't.

But later on, perhaps in Kingston-upon-Thames, Francis paints Nipper as he remembers him, looking into the gramophone with love and hope. He takes the picture to a record company to sell it. And they think that it is just perfect for them.

They think it is so perfect, in fact, that they name their company after the picture of Nipper listening for Mark: They call their company: "His Master's Voice" (HMV). They even give Francis a job and for the rest of his working life Francis paints pictures of Nipper listening to Mark for HMV.


Based on the memories of Rosie Hall (Powell), my great grandmother, one of the children who played with Nipper.

Comments

  1. brought tears to my eyes,,literally,,

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is sad. But one of the children, who was sent to an orphanage, kept up a correspondance with my great grandmother, so perhaps they got through it somehow. Let's hope so.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov