Skip to main content

Letter from Tony Hall, March 1963

From M. A. Hall
Frankenwald,
c/0 University of the Witwitisrand
Johannesburg
AFRIQUE DU SUD



Mr and Mrs R. Steinhardt
9 Rue Roger Bacon
PARIS 17
FRANCE


8th March, 1963


Dear Mom and Richard,

I have just sent you a telegram to say that the appeal failed for Eve and the other three. But, you know, all the lawyers told us there was not much chance of anything being taken off the sentence. I did hope hard, of course, but it is just as well it's over and we know where we stand. We set so little store by it that we expected the disappointments.

The day before yesterday a Sunday Times reporter went up to Pietersburg and was shown around the prison. The reporter, Margaret Smith, whom we know fairly well, got permission to do a story on the women's section. Yesterday she was able to give me quite a detailed account of regulations and routine. She saw Eve and the other three sitting with the rest of the women in a sort of sewing room where they do crochet work all day. They gave her a big smile (the four who know her) but did not try to communicate in any way, as it is not allowed. The prison is a modern airy place, with good facilities compared to the other places.

The routine is up early, breakfast, then they go to the workroom for their crocheting until 11. Then half an hours exercise outside, followed by lunch. Back to the crochet until 4. Supper until 4.30 and into their cells by five - except for eight of them, including the four political prisoners, who have permission to study in the workroom until 11p.m.

These 8 occupy quarters leading into this workroom. They are allowed to talk most of the time. Some cells are single, some have several beds. I don't know what Eve is in. The cells contain bed, locker and mirror. The beds have coloured counterpanes. They wear make up and print dresses on Sunday and may study all day. I have arranged for the Anglican priest in Pietersburg to visit Eve every Saturday afternoon. So, although it is difficult to pass actual messages, we can get an idea of what's going on with each other through this kind man. He wrote to me yesterday to say Eve seemed very cheerful and relaxed.

I was rather depressed when I last wrote, Mom and it was sweet of you to write comfortingly. But you mustn't think of our activities or beliefs as 'nonsense'. Ours is quite a mature approach to the situation in this country - which every intelligent person in the world knows to have gone quite mad. Of course we won't do anything more. They have tightened things up so much in the last year - even Liberals are being banned. They'll be getting at Helen Suzman in a couple of years, mark my words. However, this doesn't mean we are going to give up our beliefs. But let us not discuss this subject again. The boys have been through a bout of tonsil infection, one after another, but are now fully recovered. I'll be sending you the most gorgeous pictures soon.

Lots of love,

Tony

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-