Gary Mckinnon's hacks confirm the findings of "Disclosure"
A colleague pointed me in this direction.
Listen to the following statements from pilots, astronauts, high level engineers, high ranking military officers and scientists from all around the world - most of whom came forward as Disclosure witnesses, about two years ago.
The evidence for Identified Flying Object (IFO) activity seems very strong. And if these beings aren't friendly we are toast. Extraterrestrial technology seems to be way beyond ours. One reliable witness saw a huge craft emerge from the water and travel upwards at an estimated speed of 7000 miles per hour.
After reading about the disclosure project, I put the case to a class of 16 postgraduate students. We had a mock trial. We put UFOs / IFOs on trial. One practicing lawyer acted for the defence and another for the prosecution. We had one expert witness: currently a lieutenant in the army. Two people out of the 17 in the class had actually seen UFOs.
At the end of the class and after hearing the case for the prosecution and the defence, the "jury" deliberated and the overwhelming conclusion was that UFOs, (which should now be called IFOs, exist.
Watch the videos, most of them from the Disclosure press conference, if you haven't seen them already:
Military strategist working on US missile programme
Iranian air force general
Belgian army major general reporting vast sighting after which 16 jets were scrambled
Buzz Aldrin
Astronaut Gordon Cooper
Col Charles Holt
Governor of Arizona, Air France Pilot, Belgium sighting,
British defence official
Captain Ray Bowyer
Mexican air force video taken from an infra red camera. Objects were invisible to the naked eye, but not to the infrared camera.
French astrophysicist
Peruvian military pilot, investigator
Pilot, crew and passengers of US airliner, military decoder for the US navy, Lockheed design engineer
Here's the low down from the press conference.
Pedro Hernandez in Metepec, May 2009
There's just too much evidence for the existence of IFOs now.
A colleague pointed me in this direction.
Listen to the following statements from pilots, astronauts, high level engineers, high ranking military officers and scientists from all around the world - most of whom came forward as Disclosure witnesses, about two years ago.
The evidence for Identified Flying Object (IFO) activity seems very strong. And if these beings aren't friendly we are toast. Extraterrestrial technology seems to be way beyond ours. One reliable witness saw a huge craft emerge from the water and travel upwards at an estimated speed of 7000 miles per hour.
After reading about the disclosure project, I put the case to a class of 16 postgraduate students. We had a mock trial. We put UFOs / IFOs on trial. One practicing lawyer acted for the defence and another for the prosecution. We had one expert witness: currently a lieutenant in the army. Two people out of the 17 in the class had actually seen UFOs.
At the end of the class and after hearing the case for the prosecution and the defence, the "jury" deliberated and the overwhelming conclusion was that UFOs, (which should now be called IFOs, exist.
Watch the videos, most of them from the Disclosure press conference, if you haven't seen them already:
Military strategist working on US missile programme
Iranian air force general
Belgian army major general reporting vast sighting after which 16 jets were scrambled
Buzz Aldrin
Astronaut Gordon Cooper
Col Charles Holt
Governor of Arizona, Air France Pilot, Belgium sighting,
British defence official
Captain Ray Bowyer
Mexican air force video taken from an infra red camera. Objects were invisible to the naked eye, but not to the infrared camera.
French astrophysicist
Peruvian military pilot, investigator
Pilot, crew and passengers of US airliner, military decoder for the US navy, Lockheed design engineer
Here's the low down from the press conference.
Pedro Hernandez in Metepec, May 2009
There's just too much evidence for the existence of IFOs now.
Wow, that's a great resource of links, thanks. The evidence is piling up as you say but still questions persist. Why don't they say hello?
ReplyDeleteApparently they do and they have and they are -according to the disclosure project which Gary McKinnon and a colleague brought to my attention.
ReplyDeleteThe number and the quality of witnesses is astounding and many bring documented evidence.
What I'd want to see to believe any of this, Phil, is testimony from witnesses tested for imaginative ability. If enough people who score a perfect zero or below** can describe these things in detail, I'll start paying attention. Nothing is as powerful as imagination.
ReplyDelete(**negative scores being awarded to those who, like someone I know, react angrily to suggestions that they use their imagination)
Do you think that all these Drs. and Generals and governers and engineers and pilots are all in some kind of mass hallucinatory collective funk?
ReplyDeleteIf you could get someone with zero imaginative ability to testify then you would be talking about a robot. And then someone would have to interpret the findings of the robot.
There are people on this planet who are belief weaklings. They can't believe things that are true but difficult to believe and they end up denying the holocaust and climate change because - well such a thing can't really be happening, could it? Because such a thing couldn't have happened, could it.
They couldn't really be aliens and IFOs could there.
Famous last words. Belief weaklings can be very dangerous people.
But this has nothing to do with belief. Either these UFOs are real or they aren't.
ReplyDeleteAnd Phil, I'm never impressed by everything-and-the-kitchen-sink arguments. Of course the Holocaust happened. It's massively _documented_ in every conceivable way. . .
Climate change? Pollution and noxious emissions of various sorts are clearly playing a large part, but I don't know that anyone is in a position to say with absolute certainty what proportion of the change is man-made rather than cyclical (i.e., naturally occurring). . . Do I think that means we shouldn't be doing everything in our power to reverse the man-made component of the problem? No. Absolutely not.
... About these UFOs. I would say, fwiw, that we confront a problem of weak imagination rather than weak belief. Who says that genuine aliens will fit _our_ idea of intelligent life forms -- ie., vaguely humanoid beings? Why shouldn't alien forms of intelligence -- even from other planets -- be surrounding us already, but in the form of, say, bacteria invisible to our naked eyes?
The Thing supposedly travelling at 7,000 miles an hour (and what sort of estimate is that, anyway)-- why does it and all its equivalents always resemble the 'spaceships' we read about as children in comic books and pulp sci-fi?
All highly suspicious, if you ask me.
Well, Wordy my friend, you sound just like the other voice in my head.
ReplyDeleteDo I trust my eyes? Well to some extent I do. No what did I see? A pair of escaped balloons from a party, probably. But the exact same "balloons" were over Popocatepetl at the time of the eruption and snapped by the CENAPRED cameras. Your robot.
So perhaps they weren't balloons after all.
One would have expected UFOs to be interested in Apollo 11 and the space programme. Well...they were. Listen to Buzz Aldrin, the second man on the moon. Listen to Edgar Mitchell.
You would expect them to be interested in military capacity. Well they were. Listen to all the many testimonies from army personnel, some of them high ranking about just such demonstrations of interest.
You would expect pilots to see them. Well they have. In "droves".
But it wasn't until project Disclosure that you could take all of these things and that I could entertain the belief that IFOs are real.
I was in Matumi in November 2007
when this press conference took place, or just returned and so I missed it. But once you have heard the testimonies and once you have thought about everything all these supremely reliable witnesses have to say then, though you may not have "scientific" proof - and anyway how can you prove something you don't understand, then it is your intellectual responsibility to entertain the belief that IFOs are real.
In not doing so one is shirking the responsibility to think rationally.
The imagination itself is a wonderful friend and weapon. Let me thing of the imagination as a sort of snow plough. It clears spaces where you can contemplate the reality of irreality of a phenomena. For example. The imagination creates Dyson spheres and so we search for Dyson spheres and hope to find them - if NASA hasn't brushed them out too.
But without the imagination we wouldn't search for Dyson spheres or if we saw one we might have to assume that it was something else.
The imagination runs scouts ahead.
One of the contributors to the Disclosure press conference, referring to the "57" vaireties of alien beings (I kid you not) as mainly humanoid, tries to share his puzzlement with us. And says something along the lines of:
We would have expected them to take other forms, but they all seem to be humanoid in one way or another. Some of them are indistinguishable from us and our scientists have thought long and hard on why this must be so."
Quite. Scientists have...but anyone who has ever read Larry Niven's Known Space books or watched Star Wars movies will already know the answer...
"Long, long ago in a galaxy far away..."
And what I am saying is not trivial. It is our intellectual responsibility to seriously entertain the belief that IFOs exist.