Skip to main content

Is the Cygnus bubble a Dyson sphere?






















Picture from the Mount Wilson Observatory


Is the amazing solar system sized bubble in Cygnus discovered by Dave Jurasevich of the Mount Wilson Observatory, a Planetary nebulae or is it a Dyson sphere or a dyson Bubble? In fact it is not a Dyson sphere or a Dyson bubble. Astronomers and physicists can tell the difference. But the bubble inspires speculation. What if it were a Dyson sphere in construction?

From an article in the New Scientist on the dog day of 23rd July: "Giant Soap Bubble Found Floating in Space" It seems far too symmetrical.

There are a number of ways we are supposed to detect extraterrestrial life. One, of course is from radio signals like the "WOW" signal, never to be repeated, emanating from the Chi Sagittarii star group.

But another way was suggested by Dyson's thought experiment: Instead of radio signals look for Dyson spheres, which are artificial mega structures that enclose the orbit of a star, fabricated from the material of that solar system.

Consequentlly, in his article "A program to search for dyson spheres with the infrared space observatory" in Acta Astronautica (1998) C. N. Tilgner suggests that:

"The task to distinguish a Dyson sphere from natural dust components therefore reduces in the first place to the question: does the infrared excess spectrum fit to a single-temperature blackbody radiation or can the spectrum only be fit by a superposition of several blackbody curves with different temperatures? Of course, the accuracy of the fit directly depends on the number of spectral points measured for the target."


The Dyson sphere is the marker of what Kardashev calls a Type 2 civilisation. A Type 1. civilisation is capable of utilising all the energy resources available to a planet. A Type 2 civilisation is capable of using up all the energy produced by a star. A Type three civilisation uses up all the energy produced by a galaxy. Dyson spheres have become a relative standard in modern science fiction. Larry Niven introduced a variation on the theme: a Dyson Ring in "Ringworld".

Using Drakes equation , as Carl Sagan does here, to calculate the number of potentially advanced technological civilisations out there in our galaxy the numbers of advanced technological civilisations may be, alternatively 10 or a million, depending on how you estimate the last number of this simple sum.

You could add one more factor to that equation, though. How many Type 1 civilisations are there among the 4 billion stars of our galaxy? How many of these are Type 2 civilisations and how many are Type 3?

What is the number of civilisations among those technological civilisations that are capable of producing a Dyson sphere.?

If you used Sagan's initially quite conservative estimate based on the duration of a technical civilisation of only a few decades, then it is probable that one in a hundred of these could evolve a Type 2 civilisation then that would mean that there are unlikely to be Dyson spheres in our galaxy.


However, factoring in a much longer lifespan for a technical civilisation, there may be thousands or tens of thousands of Dyson spheres in our galaxy. They would still be hard to find in a swirling crowd of 400 billion stars I imagine.

In fact, researchers have discovered catalogued many sources of infrared radiation which they deduce could be Dyson spheres, what they call ACs or Astroengineering Constructions.

According to M. Yu Timofeev, N. S. Kardashev and V. G. Promyslov in Acta Astronautica, (2000) again:

"AC are expect to have spectra similar to the black-body spectra because they re-emit all the energy that they absorb, although in the infrared range, as already mentioned. Thus, the effective temperature of these Planckian distributions is expected to lie between 3–300 K with the spectrum peaking between 10 μm and 10 mm. We have analyzed the IRAS database and extracted a catalog of sources whose spectra are similar to the black-body emission."


According to Richard A Carrigan at Fermi lab: of 11224 potential sources of low range emissions identified by the Calgary group (Kwok et al. 1997) that might be amanifestiation of Dyson spheres in our galaxy there are only 16 who have really strong potential.

The bubble is a diameter which compares roughly with the size of our solar system - 33.5 to 29.43 arc minutes.

Logically there can only be one Type 3 civilisation in any galaxy, Type 3s have exclusivity. We don't seem to have one. Unless, that it it is, we have a partially Type three in the Milky Way that uses a lot of the energy from the core of the Milky Way, a core we can't observe.

In any event, the Cygnus bubble is a beautiful object.

Comments

  1. I have noticed that this very impressionastic and speculative article of mine has been plagiarised, without being attributed to me, by another blogger and that his article ranks a couple above mine on Google.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov