Skip to main content

The bitter aftertaste of radical secularism in Mexico



Earlier during that week in 1994 I had a conversation with the dean of humanities. "Hall," he asked me, smiling, "What do you think of the holocaust?" "It was terrible crime." I replied. "Hall," he said, "you know you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs." I was horrified. Who was I working for? Who were these people?

A secret organisation called "the Owls" controlled the university. It was hard at work in my department. In exchange for a waiver of tuition fees one of the teachers had been recruited by the Owls and it was part of his job to report on his colleagues.

And now, I found myself standing in a huge dimly lit hall. Heavy red velvet drapes hung from either side of the stage. Staff, students and parents were on their feet, intoning the university song. They were singing about avenging the death of three murdered students. Hanging down over the stage was a drape – in the middle, the black emblem of a bird.

I had always known that this was a rightwing Catholic university, but what was with the torchlit ceremonies, the secret organisation, a dean of humanities who approved of the Holocaust. It was all too much.

I was head of English at one of the largest and oldest private universities in western central Mexico in 1994. Among other things the university had its very own first-division football team, a large university hospital that educated American citizens for work as doctors in the US, and a regional newspaper.

This was a prestigious and powerful organisation, but it had a secret history of Catholic extremism. Where did this extremism come from?

In 1926, president Plutarcho Elias Calles decided to introduce a new amendment to the constitution, enforcing existing restrictions on the role of religion in public life and limiting the civil rights of the clergy.

The result was an organised Catholic resistance. With the symbol of the Virgin of Guadalaupe as their banner the Catholic insurgents called out: "Viva Cristo Rey. Viva Santa María de Guadalupe!" And the Cristero revolt began in Mexico. And when Miguel Agustín Pro, a Jesuit priest, was accused of sabotage and shot by firing squad, the revolt gathered more momentum. After seven years of civil war and insurrection, as many as 250,000 people had been cruelly killed - most of them in western central Mexico.

Finally, an arrangement was reached and the government allowed the church and cathedrals to be reopened. Although the government killing and persecution of Catholics continued for a while, the civil war eventually tailed off. In 1934, however, Lazaro Cardenas re-opened old wounds when he announced that, from then on, all education in Mexico would be socialist and completely secular.

In the resulting protests against this declaration three students were killed in Guadalajara and this lead to the formation of a breakaway Catholic university: the one I was working in. The university was created in response to the persecution of Catholics by the state, at a time when the strongest opposition to socialism was inspired by fascism. Of course, I left that place as soon as I could and I am ashamed of ever having worked there. But I also left with a clear understanding that this extremist form of Catholicism was the end result of decades of vicious persecution.

The attempt in the 1920s and 1930s to eradicate Catholicism, and "modernise" Mexico from the top downwards backfired badly. It caused lasting damage to the whole of Mexican society, and far from debilitating Catholicism it strengthened it and entrenched it, sometimes in more extreme forms.

Currently, about 90% of the Mexican population describe themselves as Catholics. In May 2000 Mexico acquired 25 brand new saints – they were all martyrs of the Cristero wars.

Comments

  1. wow, fascinating read. thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My pleasure Vesper. I still feel a little queasy at the idea that I worked for them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Disturbing piece Phil thanks

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov