Skip to main content

Tony Hall and leadership: "We did this ourselves"

In the last days of 8 Days Dad was in negotiations with all sorts of people to save the magazine. One of the options, he swore me to secrecy, is that the Libyans and Colonel Qaddafi would fund the magazine. I don't think he ever considered this seriously, especially not in 1982 when the Libyans were the bete noire of the USA and they were behaving so unpredictably.

Another idea he mentioned is that he and his colleagues could start their own magazine. His idea for the name was Compass.

Dad used to get up at around five every morning to be at the office before everyone else and he would often come home late. He put so much energy into making that magazine work. Every week he had to get out a full 62 page international magazine 80% of which was copy and only 20% of which was advertising.

One day he came home late, very depressed despite the fact that the magazine was doing well. I wondered why. Then, as he went downstairs he mentioned something briefly how people were sometimes disappointing in the way they behaved.

I immediately understood what was happening. As my friend Wordy noted, we look at things holographically, give us a little shard and we can often piece together the whole picture.

I guessed that now that the magazine was a relative success and now that it had won awards and recognition, perhaps some of Dad's colleagues were saying that they deserved the credit for it all. Perhaps they were devaluing Dad's contribution.

I quoted this line from Lao Tse to him which I think is probably the most important thing anyone has ever said on leadership and he immediately cheered up and never forgot it. In fact when I began to elaborate he said. Don't say anything else. That's really helped:

This is one of the terribly wise things Lao Tsu said on leadership and I recommend it to everyone and especially to people who work in politics, who claim they are public servants, who espouse causes and who say they are socialists, communists or anarchists.

17

A leader is best
When people barely know that he exists,
Not so good when people obey and acclaim him,
Worst when they despise him.
'Fail to honor people,
They fail to honor you;'
But of a good leader, who talks little,
When his work is done, his aim fulfilled,
They will all say, 'We did this ourselves.'

Translation by Witter Bynner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov