Skip to main content

Zeno's atrocities

William Blake, The Gates of Hell



How do you rough up Wrath, Greed, Pride, Lust, Envy, Sloth and Gluttony? 


What do you wallop them with? Blakean rhyme; with ‘bows of burning gold, arrows of desire? How about self-flagellation? Equanimity and acceptance? We sit in theatres of cruelty - in our living rooms in front of screens, and then writers, actors and directors serve us up with large portions of evil, for entertainment.

Assuredly, evil is better understood personified. Coppola, Tarantino and the Cohen brothers plagiarised the life of The Iceman, who killed over 200 people for the Mafia. These directors flaunt evil in quixotic, individual packages - they excuse themselves suggesting that they offer explanatory metaphors for capitalism, where Iago the killer is a City boy now, a speculator in futures who short sells country debt. He’s out for himself, for profit. He says:

There are those who know the score and fake their respectability and honesty when they are just out for themselves;  in it to line their pockets.I am one of them. I am not what I seem. I am not what I am.

Greater evils come wholesale. Jung wrote how the failure to come to terms with the unconscious would manifest itself dangerously in European history, projecting the darkest shadows. 

In the new dark ages  evil behaves like a Djin: like the Belgian coloniser, the bombers, those who sprayed Agent Orange in Vietnam. Eichmann alone was banal and pitiable – an uncoiling snake on the guillotined head of a Medusa .  

Evil perceives that it is put upon: Radio Thousand Hills in Rwanda chanted:

"Do not be afraid, know that anyone whose neck you do not cut is the one who will cut your neck...Let them pack their bags, let them get going, so that no one will return here to talk and no one will bring scraps claiming to be flags!" 

The Raj was the victim of the mutiny; Davey Crocket was a victim of the Mexicans. 3,000 New Yorkers trump 655,000 Iraqis. David Starkey blames the Black British community for the recent riots.

And big evils trump little evils making them temporarily vanish. Those who claim common identity with victims may commit crimes, so long as they are lesser than the crimes perpetrated against them. The Pater Noster in reverse. 

The Crimes of the KLA are trumped by the massacres carried out by Milosevic's Serbs. In this Zeno's paradox of evil, evil can subdivide within a finite space until finally it reaches its substrate - the individual. And there, there is also evil, the abuse of private and professional power. A teacher destroying the confidence of a young child with a single put down, remembered forever.

And how about you? Could you avoid the moral contamination that accompanies power? The powerful ignore right and wrong, they act upon the world. Talk to them about good and evil and they will smile. They have their own moral accounting systems which always leave them in the black. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov