Skip to main content

Terry Gilliam's opera about Faust and the Nazis

 Terry Gilliam enlightens us, through opera, about corruption and the Nazis


What is astounding to me is that no one has linked the old German high culture of Goethe and Schiller with Nazism more often and more directly before. Not only in the sense of culpability, but in relation to the themes explored.

It's interesting how high culture and racial superiority are so closely linked.You can almost hear the Nazis and their vast German following, not all of whom are dead yet say:

But we are superior. German culture is superior. We produced Beethoven and Beethoven produced the 9th Symphony and that really good bit by Schiller, what was it?

Alle Menschen werden Brüder, - ale menshen verden brider..

Hmm. Now. The inferior races and cultures couldn't produce that could they?'

Not since the musical Spring Time for Hitler and Germany has anyone put Nazism into song in such a big way. And who is the more profound comic and who has more 'gravitas' when it comes to linking music and performance with Nazism. Mel Brooks I think. And The Producers is more profound than the aspirational The Damnation of Faust.

But of course Faust is a perfect match.

Ones artistic aspirations should never attempt to encompass the horrors of the Second World War. Primo Levi's books, where he deals with the experience of the holocaust were not books, not the wank objects of the bourgoise of a former imperial power, they were historical documents. Art trivialises in this instance.

Holocaust exploitation literature and films, where these events are fictionalised by people who were never there or have no direct connection with events are the most disgusting and shameful manifestation of our literary and artistic culture.There is no metaphorical account of the holocaust because no metaphors are more striking than the plain and unvarnished description of the events that took place.

If people who were there or were close to these events do not like to talk about them and only do so because they feel their responsibility is to do so and if whole generations have been struck dumb by the horror of what happened and prefer not to think about it then who is Terry Gilliam or some such, to make sense of the holocaust to us.

Any attempt to make sense of the holocaust has already been done by the survivors and their relatives, Anna Arendt, Primo levi and many others. Is there any greater insult or offense than to have a facetious post modernist patch together his account. Post modernism, not in the French sense, but in the materialist social Darwinist way culture is deconstructed now, is a a foul leaving. It dehumanizes everything it touches and offers no insights.

Certainly, I hope to have no insights into Germany or Nazism or Faust from a modern materialist. How is a modern materialist qualified to pontificate and draw lessons on the holocaust or on hell and damnation. There is a sort of horrible soft philistine hubris to the middle class consumption of culture. It disgusts me. For them the holocaust is just a reference point. For them Gilliam is profound. It revolts me.

'Always look on the bright side of life.' not quite Die Moorsoldaten.

Did it end on that evocative song. Full of respect. How can someone who has the form of a sarcastic clown, associated with a sarcastic bunch of Cambridge Footlights establishment clowns expect trust in his work.

And yet Mel Brooks in The Producers. My respect to that man - to Mel.

The truth is that art does not define experience. 

Gilliam might say:

'No, I did not witness the holocaust, but I have read about it, and seen pictures and newsreels of it and I've met a few survivors.'

'Now listen to this operatic account of my reactions to this.'

Think. For some people the reactions of Terry Gilliam in operatic form will be the most 'emotionally powerful' (weren't those the words used) version of events.

In a sense then the artist usurps and Gilliam is a usurper.

He stands between you and the sun, the darkness. He puts his offering out there and if the 'critics' and the 'public' respond well to him then to understand the holocaust and Faust we wait until Gilliam's fat lady sings and...

- Hey presto! Gilliam is the holocaust.

Or in the spirit of Lois the Sun King he can say - not that he ever would the sensitive venerable old gentleman:

Le Holocaust c'est moi.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov