Skip to main content

I hate the platonic essence of Generation X



Reconstituted like a Turkey Twizzler - the philosophy of generation X

Generation X are those men and women who hide amongst the good people of the 35 to 45 age bracket. They are located right at the rotting end of Thatcherism. They are John Major's children and adopted social Darwinism and the new materialism as their philosophy. To them, not only was greed good, but greed in its component parts was good. They plagiarised madly and shallowly.

You can't pilfer in Generation X world. The world of the DJ. Intellectual property is a joke unless it's reconstituted. I was disgusted by it's exponents. The DJs the re mixers. It shows how toxic trickle down philosophy can be when even the wide boys and girls didn't have to finds arguments against thieving other people's music and remixing it. And now intellectual property theft is mainstream. I wonder if John Berger would sanction it? I doubt he would.

Give me Julie Birchill any day. Now she was my generation.People like Emin, lead Generation X. They worked in a knacker's yard of culture. They were contestants in scrap heap challenge they were bodgers and that seemed clever at the time.

*     *      *

Cheesecake philosophy



So, let's say you have an 'idea' for the perfect cheesecake. Here we have a serious problem. Your idea of something depends on your lived experience of it. In the sensory realm it is hard to imagine the taste of things without having truly experienced them first. This is why the problem of authenticity is a real problem and philistine British chefs feels threatened by it.

Diana Kennedy, for example, could probably do a good job of describing the soul of a flauta. A Texan cook out champion could describe the soul of Chile con Carne.

But can you describe the soul of a cheesecake. Well if you can't this could be for several reasons perhaps. Poverty of experience, poverty of the imagination. a lack of respect for the dish.

In my view a lot of writing on food as a whole in  places like the Observer reads like it's written by the generation I most despise. Generation X. Generation X was a sour, bitter, limited unaccountably self regarding and philistine generation.

In fact they just swallowed the reigning philosophy of their youth: Postmodernism.

This is why 'authenticity' is something they despise. But truly, who wants to eat 'postmodernist' food. Not me. It doesn't sound delicious and even when it is delicious after you've eaten it you don't think of it as a cultural experience but as a deconstruction of cultural experience.

This is why Masterchef has 40 somethings cooking deconstructed dishes. To hell with deconstructed dishes. Give me a constructed one, not food that makes me snigger.And just a little note. The mature cheddar and whisky jelly cheesecake is the reason why Tim should not have won Masterchef. There is a difference between creation and re-concoction.

Will British cooking ever recover from the influence of the catering colleges that produced  cooks like Jaimie Oliver. Almost all the main British chefs are vacuous philistines. Worst of all if they were influenced by post modernism they didn't even know they were. At  least cooks on the continent know what they are doing. They are aware of the philosophical and artistic implications of what they do. They don't just  follow in the wake of culture.

So much of what is written about food in Britain can't take itself seriously. It sniggers. People eating their dinner in the toilet  in a Bunel film. Or else, like Gekko, they vaunt greed. Or else it there is an article, poe-faced with a Jewel like tear running down it's beautiful child's eye, about the poor people of Bangladesh. Whose thinking of them? Again we served up half understood useless emoting, with an analysis that stops short.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-