Skip to main content

Tony Hall on US intervention in Somalia

Somalia 1993: Snafu Americana

The US troops' Mogadishu beach-landing was a PR comedy of Forrest Gump proportions, ending in tragic PR disaster – but it was again, more an effort, initially, at peacekeeping than imperial aggression.

The capital of Somalia had totally imploded, and had been in complete anarchy for many months. So again, in the absence of an effective UN army which the post cold-war world so badly needs – not one more blue-beret detachment to monitor buffer zones – some force would sooner or later go in and try to restore basic order.

Remember, the implosion of Mogadishu was in no way the immediate or even medium term fault of any outside power. It happened like this: sub clans of the Hawiye – the main original clan of the city and surrounding countryside – having driven out president Siad Barre and his Marehan clan and their allies, in weeks of brave house-to-house and street battles, after years of increasing oppression – started to turn their RPGs and their AK47s against each other as soon as Siad Barre had disappeared over the horizon!

This was because Mohamed Farah Aideed of the Habr Gidr clan of the Hawiye clan family, came into the city and clashed over leadership with Ali Mahdi Mohamed of the Abgaal clan of the Hawiye family, who had led much of the city resistance and overthrow of Siad.So it came about, in the following months, that Hawiye Habr Gidr pummelled and killed Hawiye Abgaal. Abgaal Hawiye fought Habr Gidr Hawiye, until they had reduced much of the capital they had triumphantly and bravely taken, to rubble. The two main rivals, both Hawiye, now dominated different ruined quarters of Mogadishu. The streets and surrounding countryside moved into some kind of Mad Max scenario. And areas of famine bloomed.

It was into this mess that the US force landed. The problem, as in Iraq, lay in what they didn't do (or were congenitally incapable of even conceiving). They failed above all to work sensitively alongside one of the most hopeful UN initiatives for peace ever, which was embarked on under UN special representative Mohamed Sahnoun, a former Algerian diplomat and OAU senior official, and a man greatly respected by our liberation movements over the struggle years.

Sahnoun was in the middle of sensitive negotiations with clan elders, as a way of bringing the warlords to the peace table, when he was swept aside by UN Secretary-General Boutros Ghali, at the behest of the Americans. The US government didn't have a clue how to deal with the situation, and didn't give a bugger, any more than they did in Iraq or in Viet Nam – or do now.

Of course the US government usually ends up promoting the interests of the worst elements – that's what it is usually geared to do. But it was the Somalis, having been messed up in the early 1970s by US imperialism interfering with the possibility of a socialist alliance between Somalia, Ethiopia and South Yemen, who now, 20 years later, shot themselves in the foot. Only then came pax Americana – or rather, snafu americana.

Tony Hall

Eve Hall, working for the UNHCR followed later by Tony Hall working for the UNDP, spent almost a decade in Somalia.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov