Skip to main content

Do the Liberal Democrats have any red lines?

 Ed Davey held to task


Ed Davey, LibDem MP and Undersecretary of State for Business

In a conversation an hour ago, Ed Davey insisted that if it wasn't for their participation in the government then things would have been much worse. We act as a brake on the Tories and are able to introduce a lot of policies that we are proud of.

Look, I said. I voted against the Tories, but thanks to you, I've got a Tory government.

No, you got a LibDem MP and we've done a lot to look after people. He gave me some examples. We've helped disadvantaged children...He continued.

Blunket, and Reed and others came on TV and ruled out the possibility of a  coalition with the Labour government anyway. And it would have been a minority government.

What we see, I said, the people on the left who supported the LibDems because  of their green policies and tuition fees and so on, is that  you are all like Nick Clegg. You  have no red Lines. There are no deal breakers for you. Look at the reform of the NHS. Look at your policy on tuition fees.

I can only apologise for tuition fees he said, but on the matter of the NHS we are the ones who are making Andrew Lansley stop  and pause for reflection and consultation. That's us.We don't think it's a good idea to concentrate all the power in the hands of a few stakeholders.

What about privatisation? Are you happy with that.

He looked away and avoided answering the question.

I said, Vince Cable scuttles around Twickenham nowadays, he's too afraid to face his own voters. A friend of mine usually greets him, but Vince Cable, knowing what the friend would say  to him, almost ran into his house before  the friend could say a word.

Well Vince and I both use public transport, Said Ed Davey, unlike other MPs.

That's good, I said, but let me give you some advice. I think you are a good politician, effective and moral. Stand up to the Tories. You need red lines. We need to know what the deal breakers are for the LibDems in the coalition.

Well when you are in government you can't go around announcing these things he says, but it's on the record. The Telegraph entrapped Vincent, but they entrapped me too into saying I disagreed with  the Tory policy on housing benefit. 

Look, save your career, I suggested. Join up with Kennedy and Vince Cable and Simon Hughes and stand up to the Tories and show some backbone because you have lost the left who voted for you. Show us you  have a spine and the Tories can't do just anything they like with you.

Read the coalition agreement, he said. It's a comprehensive document. An achievement. A lot of our policies are in there. We are introducing a lot of good policies.

But they are just sops, I said, not substantive. Essentially, this is a reactionary government making unnecessarily radical and unfair cuts that reflect their in-egalitarian priorities, and you are propping it up. You should leave  the coalition and form a new coalition with Labour.

Ed Davey, didn't sound convinced  and said. The cuts would have happened anyway.

Show us your red lines, show us your deal breakers. I repeated.

And with that Ed Davey left.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-