Skip to main content

Stop Killing Baboons in Mpumalanga

Stop the killing’ of baboons in the mountains of Mpumalanga, South Africa!




At least 1,914 baboons had been ‘removed’ by a controversial ‘trap and shoot’ method by FSC Certified plantation companies during the past two years. Most of the affected troops were from the Sabie, Graskop and Blyde River areas in Mpumalanga province, South Africa.

GeaSphere is demanding an immediate moratorium on the killing of baboons by FSC certified companies and the de-certification of plantation companies involved in this practise.

Baboons are a integral part of our environment. They perform various vital functions, such as dispersing seed of indigenous plants they naturally eat. Very little data is known about baboon dynamics in our area, or the long term consequence of removing baboons in such large numbers.

Baboons damage pine trees by removing patches of bark reducing the value of the timber and in some cases killing the trees – causing financial losses to the plantation industry. This problem was first reported in 1975, and ever since the timber industry was at war with the baboons.

The ‘Baboon Damage Working Group’ BDWG was established by the industry to “find suitable management options to limit baboon damage that comply with the laws of the country, comply with plantation forests certification standards and address the ethical and emotional concerns”. GeaSphere attended both BDWG Public meetings since 2008 – and proposed several non lethal management solutions, none was examined or followed up upon. At the meeting in 2010 only the ‘damage’ was showcased – there was no serious effort to consider any control method apart from ‘removal’ by the trap and shoot method.

When considering damage baboons inflict upon pine trees, one should also consider the damage massive monoculture plantations of alien trees inflict upon the natural biodiversity in our area. Baboons are but one of hundreds of thousands of indigenous plant and animal species that is being annihilated by timber industry in Southern Africa.

If profit hungry directors of large corporations continue to smother the life out of our natural environment we will lose the natural services on which we depend and suffer the consequences. We cannot live from Industry only... We need Nature!

This formal complaint was endorsed by the following organizations:

Born Free Foundation, Beauty Without Cruelty, Rettet den Regenwald e.V., Pro Wildlife e.V., International Young Nature friends (IYNF), Public Environmental Arbiters, Federation for a Sustainable Environment, EcoDoc Africa, Well Worn Theatre Company, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Regenwald und Artenschutz (ARA), BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN OV Versmold, Green Times
South East African Climate Consortium Student Forum (SEACC SF), TimberWatch, Primates Africa, ECOPEACE, Asociacion Mexicana por los Derechos de los Animales (AMEDEA), Andre Menache (Member of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (MRCVS)), Quaker Concern for Animals, Lutz Fähser (Founding member of FSC Germany)

For a copy of the complaint please contact Tim StrupatFor more information contact:Philip Owen, GeaSphere Chairperson


Cell: 0027730980867


Mail:
owen@soft.co.za

December Ndhlovu, GeaSphere Community Coordinator


Cell: 0027827007137


Mail:
josephndhlovu@webmail.co.za


 Tim Strupat (GeaSphere Volunteer)


Cell: 0027825167613


Mail: tim@strupat.deThe environmental pressure group GeaSphere submitted a formal complaint to the FSC – Forest Stewardship Council – on Tuesday, 11 January 2011.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov