Skip to main content

Eve Hall: The pintailed whydah is a bully.


The Pintailed Whydah is a bully.

To comment on the cleverness or stupidity of birds, one has to be anthropomorphic – how else translate their actions, and give them a meaning?


So that’s the way I’ve tried to think about it and I’m afraid I’ve come to the conclusion that they’re nothing but a pretty face - the “bird brain” label sticks.


Chickens are stupid. When they’re scared, they huddle together and suffocate each other; and they rush across roads in the face of oncoming traffic. In fact their brains are so redundant that they can still run around without them.


From my experience, geese too are stupid, never mind what the Romans say – they can’t in fact tell friend from foe, and gaggle indiscriminately. My landlady in Harare had a flock of them in her garden that refused to recognise me as a legitimate, fully paid-up tenant.


What’s more stupid looking (and actually, bloody frightening) than seeing 12 geese rush at you, necks outstretched, hissing?


Hadeda ibises are stupid – they fly over our heads crying with hunger but don’t spot our invitingly cricket-pitted lawn.


Grey hooded kingfishers are stupid – they get the crickets, but try to take a short cut by flying through our closed windows.


Lesser striped swallows are stupid – they take a wrong turning out of their nests and into our dining room and can’t retrace their steps to get out again.


Then there’s the male pintailed whydah, aka King of Six – the quintessentially stupid domineering male. For most of the year he’s just an LBJ* among other LBJs, humble, small, insignificant. But come October, he has a rush of testosterone, grows a very long tail, and becomes the nastiest bully on the block.


 The books say he has six wives (or five, depending on the source) and it is for them that he chases all other birds away – and not only birds: this twopenny’s worth of feathers even swoops furiously at us, fully grown, adult humans if we come near the bird tray.


The bulbuls, the black collared barbets, the cape- white eyes, all larger them he is, keep away in the face of this harassment.


After two months of exhausting aggression, the females have (one assumes) eaten their fill (though that’s not certain, because he seems to chase them off as much as anything or anyone else), and they “cuckoo” (i.e. lay their eggs in) the nests of the common waxbill. Then the long tail feathers drop off the male, and he becomes just another meek little hopping LBJ again.


The only ones who maybe come out quite well in all this are the female whydahs – perhaps not so stupid: they drop off their young and run.

* Little Brown Job



By Eve Hall

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov