Skip to main content

A meeting with a kind professor

I've just had a long meeting with a professor of German at the University and in a short space of time he explained many things to me in addition to translating several letters from the period of the war and the period just prior to the war.

I didn't know that both families were in touch with each other. I didn't know that Heini was such an important go between in the whole affair. I didn't know that the Prague ghetto was even worse in some cases than the Warsaw ghetto and that Regine was living with all her important possessions taken away from her in a ghetto with very little food and certainly no protein.

Regine confided to Heini, forbidding him to tell Else or Lisa that she was in such a desperate situation. She was considering suicide because it was so bad. Pathetically, she offers to help Heini. "Some things are available here which you might need." she says, and sends Heini and Caroline her bedding and a few other things. Carolin is 67. She berates God and given the depth of sorrow he would have to look down upon she doubts he exists all.

"We have to face things with Stoicism. We have to face what life presents us with, but my courage is not equal to this situation.", she says, and she questions: "Why do we humans clasp onto life when it is so debased? If I had the courage I would commit suicide but I don't have the courage. Please don't tell the children this."

And then she apologises profusely for having importuned Heini and says that in her brief meeting with him and Carolin Göbel she realises that they are noble people and that they have their own problems too.

It's hard to read this, but it was a million times harder to live it. The professor told me that Theresienstadt was the "model" concentration camp. But Treblinka, says my colleague and friend who curated a holocaust museum, was a charnel house where people were burned alive.

My great Grandmother was terrified by what was happening to her. Heini, who met her just before she was taken away said that she was full of extreme anxiety - shaking with it. And then they took her away and did all the horrible things they threatened to do to her and millions of others.

And when my mother talked about God it was very simple; she echoed her Grandmother's words who implored God to help her, but at the same time doubted that a God could ever exist. "How could there be a God when he permits such suffering? It's not possible to have a good God who can allow this to happen" she says.

My Catholic wife tells me: Why torment yourself about the past. It doesn't matter to these people now. They are in heaven. That's what we believe. That's where they deserve to be. And I really don't understand that reaction.

Comments

  1. A very moving piece Phil. Nothing to add, words just fail.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think they do, Edwin.

    The professor was very calm and paused while he translated. The room was quiet and the words in the voice of my great grandmother fell heavily into that silence.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Won't comment directly, for the same reason as Edwin Moore.

    ... About your closing remark, though -- no two people endure or explain the unspeakable and unimaginable to themselves the same way, Phil. It's one of those reminders of the cliche that we're all alone, ultimately. . . I've been considering this in a different context, the horrors of contemporary end-of-life care, even for perfectly ordinary lives and ends.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Damn right. That is horrifying.

    But it can be managed quite well, can't it - with the right resources?

    Of course Obama is trying to help out there and the insurance companies and vested interests are trying to stop him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous06:09

    Careful now, if you anything _friendly_ about Obama I might concluded I've accidentally posted on someone else's site. :)

    .. . Resources aside, deep philosophical disagreements make the managing exceedingly difficult ...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Trying again ... [ sigh ]

    Careful now, if you say anything _friendly_ about Obama, I might conclude that I've accidentally posted on someone else's site. :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Any good thing from Obama is gratefully accepted, but I don't believe he has a hope in hell.

    Good thing that he cancelled the Star Wars programme. Wonderful.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov