Skip to main content

Bildungsromans for the zeitgeist

For teenagers, GCSE, BTEC, A-level and International Baccalaureate results are days away and fate stands by, snickering, with a sharp pair of scissors in its hands. Later on this summer after they get their results, these teenagers may have cause for reflection. They might even consider turning to literature for consolation or counsel. But what books should they read?

Of course they could always plump for Great Expectations, The Bell Jar, The Catcher in the Rye or A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Some fiction hits the sweet spot of every generation. But isn't most coming of age fiction friable? Doesn't its relevance fade? Obama may be the first mixed-race US president, but how many teenagers will read James Baldwin's Go Tell It on the Mountain?

My generation flipped through novels without the help of colour-coded guidance from publishers and bookstores. Even so, we quickly found our way. The 70s zeitgeist spoke through a megaphone. We read Catch-22 and Slaughterhouse-Five because the Vietnam war was senseless; we read Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas because taking drugs was counter-culture and rebellious; we read Siddhartha because Oriental religions still promised answers; we read Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance because the most influential post-hippy truism was that the only truth worth a bean was the truth inside you. Promiscuity was liberating, so we read about zipless fucks in Erica Jong's Fear of Flying. But we only really read Portnoy's Complaint to find out exactly what the boy did to the liver.

Of course young people read silly books for silly reasons. A sloe-eyed Serbian Mona Lisa suggested that I read those interminable Germans, Hesse and Mann, and so I did. I read The Glass Bead Game and The Magic Mountain and I wish I hadn't. When sweetly pretentious friends quoted strophes like "I should have been a pair of ragged claws / Scuttling across the floors of silent seas", instead of guffawing, I read The Lovesong of J Alfred Prufrock and copied them.

When teenagers adopt an adult classic they soon trash it. It soon loses its gravitas and clout and becomes cult fiction. Much coming of age fiction is suspect, isn't it? Woody Allen famously said: "If I had to live my life again, I'd do everything the same, except that I wouldn't see The Magus", and I feel the same way about John Fowles's book. The memory of reading and enjoying Richard Bach's maple syrup Jonathan Livingston Seagull can also make me cringe in embarrassment.

For understanding to bloom and the world to make sense to them, the young should not merely read literature that reflects on their immediate concerns, but books which reflect the zeitgeist, as ours did. They should read around the filibustering of religious narratives in the face of evolution, on the theme of the death of the exotic, about fabulous financial foxes and climate change catastrophe.

Each generation has its own coming of age literature. What is this new generation reading?



Suggestions culled from the Guardian books blog:

Trainspotting, Remainder, On the road, 'A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius', Zeitgeist, The Wasp Factory, The Trial, The Getaway, Madamme Bovary, The Colour of Magic, Wuthering Heights, Dracula, Frankenstein, 1984, Brave New World, Death of a Salesman, The Colour Purple, Jane Eyre, The Third Policeman, The Restraint of Beasts, Candide, The Ragged Trousered Philanthropist, The Communist Manifesto, A Room with a View, Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, The Secret Life of Bees, Hemingway's stories, Collected Dorothy Parker, The Death of St. Narcissus, Terry Pratchett - Discworld, Book's Hard Boiled Wonderland, The End of the World, Norwegian Wood, Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, A Prayer for Owen Meany, The Commitments, Homage to Catalonia, Lolita, The Time Traveller's Wife, How I Live Now, The Graveyard Book, The Great Gatsby, On The Black Hill, The Master and The Margarita...

Of course in every country the list will be different.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov...

The Guardian books bloggers' poetry anthology

There more to composing poetry online than this. ..isn't there? I don't really like conventional poetry of knowing. I love the poetry of words coming into being. The Guardian is going to publish a printable book online with our poems in it and the Irish poet, Billy Mills is getting it together with Sarah Crown, the literary editor. Good for them. Let's also remember that Carol Rumens got the ball rolling. Does Des feature in this anthology? Taboo-busting Steve Augustine decided not to join in. So what are we left with? In the anthology we will be left with a colourful swatch of well-meant, undeniably conventional, occasionally clever, verses - some of them. But there could be, there should be and there is a lot more to on-line poetry than this. Than agile monkeys, koalas and sad sloths climbing up word trees. Perhaps we should focus in on translation, because in translation there is a looseness of form and a dynamism such as, it seems, we can't easily encounter in our...

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-...