Skip to main content

Obama "blackwashes" US power

Obama promises the USA Rawlsian balls

Obama will be cowed into compromising over any plans to tax and spend on the poor unless that spending is merely strategic, focused and highly limited - and he suggested as much in his speech.

I had an hour long conversation with my brother on the phone who had flown over to be at the inauguration. He thinks I am being offensively ungenerous. Isn’t Obama better than Bush, Phil? Obama is such a well meaning sincere chap. A gent. A sincere man who deserves the benefit of the doubt.

I’m sorry, but the right way to see Obama, Chris, is as the face of a massively expensive marketing exercise on behalf of US corporate capitalism. You’ve heard of “greenwash” well isn’t Obama a kind of “blackwash”.

My brother described the inauguration as an African American’s day out. A day when the dreams for African American equality came much closer. Point taken. And what a salutory effect the Obama must have on a racially divided country and a traumatised African American community.

But come on. I said. Get real bro’ It’s not all about the man Obama, is it?

It is all about the government, and the country he represents. Obama is the front man for the same country that invaded Vietnam and Iraq. The motive force that drives the USA to invade and pollute and manipulate will still be there. Obama fronts an empire. He is not going to change the essential nature of the US economic system. He’s not going to radically change the configuration of forces in that society is he?

What if Obama did try to make his society more equal and socialise it a little. What if he did intend to put a muzzle on US corporates who are on the rampage through the world. If he were really going to do this he would have to be divisive. There would have to be a little of the Chavez in Obama. But plainly and clearly that there is nothing of the Chavez in Obama. Unlike Chavez he will not take the bull by the horns.

To prove to people all across the spectrum of the right to centre right that he has “his heart in the right place” Obama has brought the market fundementalists right into the heart of his government and economic policymaking. And to prove to the corporates that he will work just as hard as Bush to guarantee markets, investment oportunities and raw materials Obama has set the hawks out to determine future US foreign policy.

Ridiculously, Obama believes that by the exercise of his personal charisma alone, and without challenging American corporate capitalism he will be permitted to tax the rich and redistribute to the poor.

That’s rubbish. In fact that is a precise definition of the Third Way. The Rawlsian way. Whereby, so long as you look after the most desperate, the single mothers, handicapped, vulnerable children, the sick, the deprived, the aged and the poorest 10%+ of society, that 10%+ ruling class can enrich itself until it explodes and do so guilt free. We’ve seen it in Britain.

The remaining 70 -80 percent of the population, the rest of us, are capitalism’s “bitch”.

Now perhaps Obama is considering extending the Rawlsian approach outside the USA’s borders (something Rawls himself did not do.) Well perhaps he will, but the same holds true. While 10% of the world may benefit in future from Obama based benificence,

Nevertheless, the remaining 70% to 80% of the developed world will always be capitalism’s “bitch.”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov