Skip to main content

Dad's memories of Jo'burg

A Pretoria boy, I had just turned nine when I first saw the huge city of Johannesburg, 36 miles to the south. I think it was VJ Day, 1945, a holiday for the Victory over Japan, so the streets were fairly quiet, all the way through the sprawl of suburbs, then the streets like canyons through the tall buildings, then out through more suburbs. Joburg began just after the road from Pretoria had passed alongside the open stretches of rough grass which people of Alex used as a golf course. Then we turned right, at the corner of Louis Botha Avenue and into Corlett Drive.

As we made that turn, my father was warning us three boys that when we started driving a car one day, we must never hang our elbow out of the window as we steer – though he often caught himself doing so – because it might be hit by a car coming the other way. He knew a man whose elbow was horribly crushed that way. The eina thought of a man with a mangled funnybone never left me. But it didn’t stop me leaning my elbow out the window on many warm days of long drives in South Africa, East Africa, England, other parts of Europe, and India, in the years to come, in the days before most cars were air conditioned.

Down Corlett Drive we went. We must have passed Homestead Road, where ten years later, and through the late 1950s, I turned in hundreds of times, emotions up and hormones jumping, to open the black wrought iron gate at number 36, and go straight into Eve’s room.

Down into the Birnam dip the old round-bodied Chev saloon went, on up past the Wanderers Club where, 14 years later, Eve and I were at the centre of a grand wedding reception.

Tony Hall

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-