Skip to main content

Memories of Araminta - an Austin 10





Women's NATION - Kenya


The Friday Commentry

By Eve Hall, 1966

I have often wanted to write a dirge on "cars I have known" - or more specifically, on one car. Araminta a little green Austin who was born in 1935, and died an ignoble death at the age of 17.

She was beautiful in her prime. Square as a little box, and just as comfortable. She embarassed our relatives, annoyed and frightened our friends, and invariably made us late for any appointment.

She was also, unhesitatingly, not to be relied on; but she rolled down hills wonderfully - except for the time a fool mechanic forgot to tighten the screws on one of her wheels.

She limped painfully down a very steep hill, with her family sitting inside her, unconscious of impending disaster.We didn't notice the extra wobble from the everyday ones, but it did seem that passing motorists looked at us with more than usual horror. But with a fine instinct of self preservation, we turned into a garage, just as the rear left wheel gave an awful little crunch and came off.

At the age of 15, she grew a little eccentric. When she stalled in heavy traffic, she refused to move until we leaped out, opened her bonnet and jiggled her terminals. Her petrol guage refused to indicate, and we had to dip a stick into her tank to check. If we forgot she never failed to make us pay the price for our neglect - and she usually chose a spot far from any petrol dump to give her last despairing and accusing gurgle.

But she was essentially an uncomplicated soul. To start her, all you needed was a hairpin to switch her engine on, and a brisk run up and down the hill with one man at the wheel and two at the mast. Then, she throbbed and purred, and was ready to go anywhere, if it wasn't too steep.

Strangers found the gusts of fumes from her gearbox disconcerting. We thought it gave Araminta a homely touch - like her corduroy unholstered seats and the windscreen wipers that had to be worked by hand.

As she grew older she shed her refinements. As we went over a bump, one faithful day, her back window fell out. From that day passengers in the back seat had to wear a raincoat over their heads or crouch under an umbrella in wet weather. Her front passenger seat collapsed and had to be propped up by an orange crate. The cap on her petrol tank had to be replaced by a cloth.

Traffic police started demanding proof of road-worthiness - but they never brought themselves to write out a summons. They were doubled up with laughter and couldn't reach the pens in their breast pockets.

Gradually, her disintegration led to her final convulsion. "Her wiring's wrong." said the garage hand. "It'll cost you £100 to have her repaired. I'll give you £5 for her - but it will cost you £10 to have her towed to the garage."

He kicked the tyres unfeelingly.

With guilt written all over our faces, and heavy hearts, we abandoned her in her hour of need. Slowley, she rotted in a slummy side street and was raped of her wheels, her seats, her windows and her handles. She was a monument to our uneasy conscience - and we breathed a sigh of relief when we saw, one rainy day, that she'd been taken away to the city dump.

Life is so much less exciting now. We don't have to walk for miles carrying gallon tins of petrol. We don't make a spectacle of ourselves by holding up double-decker buses during peak-hour traffic. We dn't clatter as we go over a bump - and we feel so much less daring as we glide in our luxurious VW.

We're no longer pioneers behind the wheel of our horseless carriage - we're just car drivers.

*****

Some pictures of the heroic rebuild of an Austin 10 by an enthusiast.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-