Skip to main content

Guardian: Robert Fox on Somali piracy

It's the ungovernability...
Obama should act as Clinton did in 1993 to try and bring order to Somalia under the auspices of the UN.
Robert Fox in the Guardian says:
Current orthodoxy sees piracy as a product or symptom of failed or rogue states. The inference from Obama's statements is that the world must fix the Somali pirate problem at source, by fixing the anarchy of Somalia itself.
Well yes. "Black Hawk Down" and all that. The US intervention in Somalia in 1993 was initially quite a selfless action. There was no benefit to the US in intervening in Somalia. It was a humanitarian intervention aimed at creating a secure environment for the delivery of aid. UN resolution 794. Of course in the end they fucked because they were incapable of reading the situation in Somalia correctly and supporting the man on the spot. The UN negotiator UN special representative Mohamed Sahnoun.
The US didn't succeed but their attempt was initially brave and principled and Bill Clinton acted well. Perhaps Obama can show his quality and act again to try and bring order under the auspices of the UN. I don't agree with the expert here. The emphasis should not be on developing a ready expertise ("security strategies") in asymmetric warfare. That idea amounts to a modern version of building Maginot Lines.
But Mr Fox's proposed solution is not the way forward:
"Navies of the world, including the US navy and the Royal Navy, have to change their operational thinking to meet the piracy problem. The big navies will need to build fast patrol ships, souped-up versions of the second world war corvettes, to cover vulnerable choke points such as the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and even parts of the Mediterranean. And they'll need lots of these light and relatively cheap ships."
But is the solution really about "operational ability". "It's the economy stupid.", said Clinton. One could also paraphrase him and say: "It's the ungovernability stupid..." Stop gap technical solutions on their own are an absurdity. The Somali's don't have warships, they have speedboats. To call piracy asymmetric warfare or not doesn't dignify piracy. The pirates cause big trouble with a few inaccurate Kalashnikovs and motorboats.
No one should be blinded by Robert Fox's military science. Asymmetric warfare is just a merely a label. But Somalia is a country where a 13 year old girl can be stoned to death in public for being raped, for God's sake! A country where that can happen is not a civilised country. In a savaged and savage country like this the people need strong government and law. Obviously the solution is to help bring civilisation and law to Somalia.
It's not only about the military lessons and legends of the South China Seas. The solution is not 55 tooled up high speed, networked, US navy coastal patrol boats. Try and bring Miami Vice the DEA and the Border Patrol to the Somali coast. Why not suggest they enforce the New York Police Department Zero tolerance piracy policy while you are about it.
Good luck with that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerogramme from Lisa and Richard

To: Mr & Mrs J. Hall, Box 49 Eikenhof (TVL) Johannesburg Afrique du Sud. 28.3.76 Dear John and Nola, Today a week ago we were still in New Delhi with Eve and Tony and the boys and the whole thing looks like a dream. We arrived on the 28.2 in New Delhi and were happy to see the whole family fit and in good health. The boys have grown very much, Phil is just about the size of Tony and the twins are above average. We stayed untill the 22nd March, as our visa ran out and we did not want to go through all the ceremony of asking for an extension. It also got hotter and I don't know how I would have supported the heat. The extra week would also have passed, so we decided not to go to all the trouble with the authorities and leave on the 22nd. I cannot tell you how happy we have been to see such a lovely family, so happy and united. It is rare to experience sucha thing and we have both all the reasons to be proud of them (when I say goth I mean you and us ). There is su

Guardian: Kate Harding's reactionary censorious blog on CiF

It should go without saying... ....that we condemn the scummy prat who called Liskula Cohen : "a psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" But I disagree with Kate Harding , (in my view a pseudo blogger), posting her blog in the Guardian attacking bloggers. It's a case of set a thief to catch a thief. The mainstream media is irritated by bloggers because they steal its thunder and so they comission people like Kate Harding , people with nothing to say for themselves, apparently, other than that they are feminists, to attack bloggers. I'm black. So I can legitimately attack "angry white old men". I'm a feminist, so I have carte blanche to call all anonymous bloggers "prats." Because yes, that is her erudite response to bloggers. No I don't say that the blogging medium can't be used to attack progressives in whatever context. Of course it can. But to applaud the censorship of a blogger by a billion dollar corporate like Google, and moreov

Guardian books blog fringe: Norman Mailer

FLASHING THE GUARDIAN -- A BOOKS BLOGGERS' REBELLION :  The unheroic censor with a death wish Part 1: In which Norman Mailer stars in an experiment in search engine optimisation By ACCIACCATURE 3 February 2009 When Norman Mailer died in 2007, informed opinion – in the blogosphere, people who had read at least two of his books – was split. The army of readers who saw him as one of the most despicable misogynists writing fiction in the 20th century was perfectly matched by warriors on the other side, who raged that the label wasn’t just unwarranted but tantamount to heinous calumny. Before commenters returned to bitching-as-usual, tempers were lost on literary sites all over the net in debating temperatures high enough to bring to mind tiles burning off space shuttles re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. After I'd agreed to a spontaneous suggestion by our good friend Sean Murray -- a pioneer and stalwart of the comments section of The Guardian’s books blog – that we re-